<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You do not have a right to privacy in your car</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/2008/07/12/you-do-not-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-your-car/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/2008/07/12/you-do-not-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-your-car/</link>
	<description>Just another useless blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micheal</title>
		<link>http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/2008/07/12/you-do-not-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-your-car/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/?p=21#comment-26</guid>
		<description>That is an interesting question and one I haven't thought about before. I'm certainly for privacy, but I do understand the reason behind the case law that governs this. As for the RV, that one is tricky. As I understand it, if the RV is plugged up and dumping sewage/charging the electricity/etc., then it is considered offlimits without a warrant. However, if it is moving, then it is considered mobile and a warrant is not needed. That's how I understand that part. But like I said, RV's are tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting question and one I haven&#8217;t thought about before. I&#8217;m certainly for privacy, but I do understand the reason behind the case law that governs this. As for the RV, that one is tricky. As I understand it, if the RV is plugged up and dumping sewage/charging the electricity/etc., then it is considered offlimits without a warrant. However, if it is moving, then it is considered mobile and a warrant is not needed. That&#8217;s how I understand that part. But like I said, RV&#8217;s are tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/2008/07/12/you-do-not-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-your-car/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michealcottingham.com/blog/?p=21#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Could you envision a challenge to this law based on the new class called "mobile homeless"? I have read a number of different articles that talk about people getting forced out of their homes and now living in their cars. Here is one article from the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/us/02cars.html

There are a number of other articles you can find quite easily that talk about this situation. If your home is your car, do your privacy rights get extended to your choice of domicile? Or are they lost? What if you've sold your house and are travelling the country in an RV? Same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you envision a challenge to this law based on the new class called &#8220;mobile homeless&#8221;? I have read a number of different articles that talk about people getting forced out of their homes and now living in their cars. Here is one article from the New York Times:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/us/02cars.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/us/02cars.html</a></p>
<p>There are a number of other articles you can find quite easily that talk about this situation. If your home is your car, do your privacy rights get extended to your choice of domicile? Or are they lost? What if you&#8217;ve sold your house and are travelling the country in an RV? Same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
